Looks as if Karen Dammann is going to continue having trouble. The Methodist church affirms that homosexuality is contrary to Christian activity; and it denies that the church can ordain openly active gay clergy.
My first response was to invite excellent gay Methodist pastors to find a understaffed, sympathetic, Episcopal diocese looking for exciting clergy. But it is more important, I think, for people to continue engaging those who think differently - to witness and challenge the received wisdom.
It has been intersting to see how our diocesan organization and minimal discipline allowed the consecration of a gay bishop.
People change when they have face to face relationships with others who think differently.
"Face to face brings respect"
Hi SV,
We're still discussing this topic over at Raw Faith. Love to have your perspective if you're willing.
Peace,
Karen
Posted by: Karen H. | May 04, 2004 at 12:05 PM
I have mixed feelings about this- on the one hand, I feel that the Methodist church will change more quickly from the inside out. On the other, why stay in a denomination that doesn't uphold and affirm your values anyway?
Seems like the same struggle the Republican party is having as well...
But I think the changing from the inside out must be the issue simply because there are several denominations that ordain openly lesbian and gay candidates, so Karen and et al could have jumped ship a lot faster if that was their only concern.
Posted by: leslie | May 06, 2004 at 03:49 PM
As an Episcopal priest, I'm not sure how to react to the comment to find an Episcopal diocese that is understaffed and needing someone creative. All of our dioceses and bishops aren't accepting. All of our parishes aren't accepting-- even those who might really really need a priest. And we-- like you in the Methodist Church-- have an ethos that has more to go than simply being able to find an accepting Diocese. We're fighting our own battles, still, in the Episcopal Church and in the Anglican Communion. Our African brothers (and they're all male, yes) are more conservative than some of your own. Perhaps it's best to stay and fight on one's own turf, where one knows the rules and the allies?
Posted by: Walter Sherman | Nov 20, 2004 at 04:38 PM