As I was dozing last night, I had a mad vision.
You know, perhaps we should sign everything in the Windsor report. Why not?
In exchange, elect +Schori Presiding Bishop.
That would really screw up the system. Far more than signing the Windsor Report, because even if we were to sign a document, and formally agree to some kind of repentance, gay people would still be blessing. Hey, let the conservatives police the state. That's what they are good at, and good for. Policing. I'm all for policing. They have a place in our church, also.
But Electing Schori would really screw it up. For everybody.
No RC dialogue. No Orthodox Dialogue. And then immense pressure on the Anglican Communion which has agreed to let women be a "local" issue. It would be a local issue no more.
Really screw it up. Let's create chaos. Within chaos, God will do that separating thing.
A woman as head of the entire church?
Lets see how Akinola would deal with that! What rebellion that would inspire in his ladies.
Yeah. I get goosebumps just thinking about it.
One
I completely agree. Let's do it! Let's completely screw the whole thing up until nobody can sort it out - and let God sort it out, at long last.
Who are these people - and who is this Church? - who think they can dictate to [more than half the world!] as to who's good enough to serve God - or even to sit in their sorry, sorry pews?
I'm so, so sick of the whole ridiculous thing.
Elect Schori! Elect Schori! Elect Schori!
Posted by: bls | Jun 17, 2006 at 12:04 PM
Well, as much as I am given to try to convince old Anglo-Catholic priests on T19 that their objections to women in orders might be premised on Christological heresy, I'm not sure I want to risk schism on this point yet.
I remember serving on a parish discernment committee a few years ago when I was young, foolish, and still very much in high school. I said that the work of the Church was "to create chaos." I like to think I've moved beyond that kind of anarchoprimitivist ecclesiology.
But while my leading favorite is still Duque-Gomez (I mean he did object to +VGR but then lead a fair listening process in his diocese and personally ordain gay clergy after being convinced of catholic truth (did I just say that?)), I think Jefferts-Schori is a fine second choice. And I'm not letting our similar academic backgrounds sway me.
"I completely agree. Let's do it! Let's completely screw the whole thing up until nobody can sort it out - and let God sort it out, at long last."
It's so tempting, bls, I know. But I sense that all schisms from the first to the last stem from this kind of thinking. The only thing we would do differently is not act like the super-pure and exclusive church of Jesus Christ. Love can be lost in chaos. Do you think we can create chaos and still live in love and with feet in the way of peace? If so, yes, let us appeal to the One Reconciler of All Things with fullest abandon. But otherwise, we should proceed with caution.
Posted by: Caelius Spinator | Jun 17, 2006 at 12:38 PM
Let's do something! Please! I was just told this morning that I must have a gay son...When I eplained I did not, but really, what did it matter, I was once again accused of poor parenting becuase I did not teach my kids of sexual orientation...Cakes - I will bake a million if I just knew where to send them!!!!
Posted by: Heidi | Jun 17, 2006 at 05:17 PM
Yes, I do like Bishop Parsley, he represents my state. But, he has not taken the stand that needs to be taken now. For that I am critical. Where would he be when I wrestle with Stand Firm? Probably telling me to rest and drink some herbal tea....Nope, I want to dance with my daughter who got me out of bed to hear John Hiatt, playing in downtown B'ham - danced to A Child Of The Wild Blue Yonder and was in heaven
Posted by: Heidi | Jun 17, 2006 at 05:24 PM
Ok, I am ready to discuss the dream I had Thursday - I haven't told anyone except my son...You now how dreams are - a little bit vague to discuss, but htere goes. I had a dream about a shop owner. His shop was at the far left side of s strip mall. I think I liked to frequent this hop - don't really know why...but all the land around his shop was blacktop. And, to the left of his shop was a fissure that ran perpendicular. It threatened to topple the foundations of all the shops if it grew....Somehow my dream fastforwarded. Someone had redeveloped the area. The fissure was now a beatiful river, with shops on either side. But, in order for me to get to this place, I had just one choice, I had to take a left turn.
No, no substance abuse before I went to sleep that night...But now I am left with a burning curiosity if it was a sign for me to act. I wish I could find my book of dreams written by an Episcopal priest. I think it was titled "Dreams: God's Forgotten Language."
Posted by: Heidi | Jun 17, 2006 at 05:44 PM
Both of my curch heroes died last year. The Right Reverand Furman Stough, the retired 8th Bishop of Alabama, and the Reverand Doctor John Claypool, retired from my church 4 years ago.
Gosh, I miss them. I know they could make sense of this stuff. So, to honor them I am diligently praying for a new Presiding Bishop to get us through all this mess.
Funny story - Bishop Stough presided at my husband's funeral along with Catholic and Episcopal Priests. After all was said and done, a dear friend of mine, a died-in-the-wool Baptist who knew Bishop Stough and his daughters because she went to school with them in Decatur, Al, called and said she was worried about Bishop Stough, he was so old he needed to walk with a cane. A short pause, and then came my laughter.I needed it "It was not a cane, it was his Bishop's staff"! She asked if I would laugh at her forever. I said yeah, probably...
Posted by: Heidi | Jun 17, 2006 at 07:26 PM
Why not go one further and choose a lesbian as a write-in candidate. Wot? No lesbian bishops? Allright, a gay one, then. V. Gene Robinson for Presiding Bishop? Now that would really f*** the system.
Posted by: Brian | Jun 17, 2006 at 09:19 PM
I like Duque-Gomez as well. To have a Presiding Bishop from outside the U.S. is forward looking. And as Br. Caelius puts it well, he represents the kind of listening processes I'd like to see happen throughout the Commuion. I don't think ++Akinola et al are ready yet to face their sexism on such a large scale. Their own women will help them there. Give them a little time and more of those international Anglican women's meetings. And when women meet, lgbt folk tend to women, afterall, they are our mothers.
Posted by: *Christopher | Jun 18, 2006 at 08:41 AM
Looks like you (we) got (y)our wish.
Posted by: D. C. | Jun 18, 2006 at 12:54 PM
Now on to the Windsor Report!
Posted by: Caelius Spinator | Jun 18, 2006 at 01:31 PM
Ha ha ha ha ha.....
Posted by: bls | Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36 PM
Can you help me out with the lottery numbers, Salty?
Posted by: Steve | Jun 18, 2006 at 01:49 PM
Now let's get on with the mission of the Church, " ... to restore all people to unity with God and with each other in Christ." BCP, p.855 (q.v.)
Posted by: RJM | Jun 18, 2006 at 02:28 PM
YOWZA! You got your wish!
See ENS from a few mn ago.
Now -- just because she's a woman doesn't mean she's a feminist. We tend to forget that the first Episcopal women priests --I mean the Philadelphia Eleven-- were all veterans of the Civil Rights Movement AND all feminists. They were concerned about a change in the system, not just about clothing women in men's clothes (which were sometimes long dresses, er, let me not get into more gender-bending here) and in men's roles.
I'm deeply grateful for Frank Griswold's ministry with us -- a man steeped in prayer (and Ignatian discernment, no less) and a steady soul. Onward in compassion and courage, let us pray and hope. Read Louie Crew's interviews of all the potential PBs. They are revealing.
Oremus! And alleluia.
Jane (your sister Oberlinian)
Posted by: Jane R. | Jun 18, 2006 at 02:43 PM
On this Father's day, the Fathers have elected a Mother - I'm giddy!
Posted by: Heidi | Jun 18, 2006 at 03:14 PM
Well. how 'bout that? Now the convention should ratify every single pro WR resolution and ajourn. Somehow don't think anyone really saw this coming. T1:9 will be able to discuss something besides homosexuality now.
Posted by: David Loving | Jun 18, 2006 at 03:42 PM
I read this yesterday and wondered if you weren't being a little cynical. But now it's true! Yah!!!
Posted by: Willow Fodor | Jun 18, 2006 at 05:22 PM
Praise God! The Holy Spirit is blowing through GC06! Amazing!
Anna
Posted by: faithwatch | Jun 18, 2006 at 08:38 PM
I'm writing to direct your attention to an ancient Epistle - 1 Timothy 2:12-15.
If you've lost your copy I can send you one, free of charge.
Your Baptist brother in Christ.
Posted by: LivingDust | Jun 21, 2006 at 07:14 PM
Living dust, with all due respect, Baptists don't believe in Bishops anyway (check out the next chapter, my friend). Seems that they are mighty selective.
Posted by: John Wilkins | Jun 21, 2006 at 07:32 PM
John,
Your right. 1 Timothy 3 addresses the qualifications for overseers, deacons and deaconesses.
How do you square up the election of Schori with 1 Timothy 2:12-15?
Was Paul somehow unclear in his instruction or is it that the Episcopal denomination just refuses to recognize the validity of his epistles?
Posted by: LivingDust | Jun 22, 2006 at 08:49 AM